Carter's Speech at Brandeis

Propaganda machines operate round the clock to keep people from seeing Palestinians as human beings who suffer and pray for justice in this world. People who dare to attempt a humane presentation of these people quickly become fodder for the self-righteous and self-proclaimed defenders of Israel. For his efforts at writing about the issue, former President Jimmy Carter has been unjustly maligned. Yet Mr. Carter's ideas need some fair airing. At Brandeis, we get a glimmer of his thinking on the history of the issue and the resultant attacks on him for his efforts. I am sure his opposition can twist his meaning. We all can twist words of others for our own arguments, yet is that an ethical approach to public debate? Can we learn what is best if we always twist others' words and ideas to suit our own biases. Listen to the speech and see if the solutions Mr. Carter proposes are truly incompatible with USAmerican ideals and values.

Immigration: Will It Be the New Wedge Issue for the Right?

Not satisfied with using issues such as abortion and gay marriage or gays in society as wedge issues to divide our country and to inject religion or religious views into public/political life, zealots for Jesus now attempt to take positions on the immigration issue. Here however, the divide will not be easily made as some Christians actually believe in the words that Christ spoke. In addition, older religions also value the tenets of treating the poor and the stranger or outsider with some charity. See the following story from alternet. News of radical religious right's positions on the immigration issue.

January 27, 2007 March on Washington

Sen Leahy

One of the deterrents to peace is mindless adherence to prejudice. The case of Maher Arar -- the Canadian citizen who was stopped at JFK airport, sent to Syria to be tortured and later found to be completely innocent--demonstrates the bias we have toward people from Middle Eastern backgrounds. This particular bias fuels anti-USAmerican sentiments and thus increases instability among people around the world caught in the rhetorics of war on terrorism. In many ways the question can legitimately posed--who is the real terrorist when innocent people from Middle Eastern backgrounds cannot safely travel within USAmerican borders?

High Technology Notwithstanding

War and Peace issues are serious matters. As one of the videos I viewed yesterday demonstrates, people's lives are altered in ways that are horrific. Those of us not living in war zones must do what we can to end as many of the causes of war as possible. Of course, idealistically speaking, finding the end of all wars does not seem possible.

A Perfect Circle - Imagine

After I listened to John Lennon earlier, I found a different version of his song. The videos are quite enlightening.

Jimmy Carter and Surviving Ideologues

History the study of it and engagement with it appeals to me as a curious human and as a scholar of issues. More often than not, we can find the strands of current issues rooted in the past. However, when people haven't a clue as to what took place in the past and the reasons for the actions of the past, then people are apt to make judgments based on their own limited and limiting world views. Additionally, an inability to understand the underlying reasons for problems in today's world can often lead to shallow and idealogical attacks on the works of people who have a tendency to be studious about the issues that we face. Such seems to be the case with former president Carter. Despite his personal experience, engagement with and knowledge of issues concerning the Middle East, his work is under attack. Yet his work is most important for he sheds light on something our media in USAmerica fails to do---he presents a point of view that is not in lock step with Israeli Zionism. Being fair does not mean one is anti-semitic, anti-Jew or even anti-Jewish state in the Middle East. However, in our democracy, taking a seldom heard position is tantamount to being "unAmerican."

A Democratic Response

Jim Webb demonstrates the kind of leadership that more democrats should exhibit.

Media Needs Character and Strength

Jane Fonda continues to do public service despite the fact that she is not among the "Hollywood" top ten box office draws anymore. In a piece she wrote and that I found in Alternet, she discusses the importance of a strong, powerful, courageous media. This is something that we do not have and without it it the opportunities for democracy and peace wither on the vine of civic life. The world as it is today in these United States consists of a weak show time-type media. Challenges to the power base do not take place. No one questions the actions of the government, which is merely an extension of corporate USAmerica. How can we have governance that is honest and responds to its citizens when people fear to question government actions and demand what is best for the country's citizens in place of the actions taken that are good for the rich and the powerful. Somewhere else I read of the increasing reality that we are now a class-based society not dissimilar from British society. Our dukes and earls are the heads of corporations. The trite pronouncements are nothing more than propaganda mouthed by the various arms of the media--from news to entertainment.

The concept of honesty and honor seem dead in today's USAmerican world and thus our standing in the world quite rightly has fallen to low levels. Tis a pity as this country has been good to many despite its imperialistic agendas and many people who live within its borders have worked to keep the founding ideals at work with a heavy cost to their lives.

Let the plans for our future develop with no war mongers and more peacemakers. That is my prayer for the future.

Misadventure Moving Us Away from Peace

Death and more death seems the paramount formula for a nebulous success in Iraq. People leading our country are increasingly shown to lack the fundamental knowledge of the histories and cultures of the the middle east where their adventurism has taken its toll on not only American service men's lives but on the lives of others. Worse there is a real danger that war profiteering goes on unchecked. Additionally, the matter of torture and death of Iraqui and other nationals raises questions of whether or not members of the current administration should be taken to world court to answer serious questions of abuse of power, genocide, and war crimes.

When we went into the invasion of Iraq without cooperation from our allies, and wit little proofs we created a terrible environment which does not allow for peace or real democratic development. It is no wonder that the Egyptians, Jordanians, Syrians, and Iranians to name just a few whose countries' stabilities are at stake, worry and reject USAmerican intrusion into the area. Later in the week I hope to connect the articles that led to my summary here in this post. However, Alternet, The Nation, The Huffington Post, and other articles provide the foundations for my conclusions.

Peace requires lack of violence in order that it thrive. Peace requires positive engagement wih people with whom we may disagree. Peace does not require saber rattling and not so veiled threats.

In a way the call for God's support in this Bushian misadventure is the last thing we need. I pray that God protect the soldiers, marines, air force, navy, and special troops that with God's grace they return as whole and as healthy as possible. I can't imagine the trauma these people endure and can only applaud their loyalty to a misbegotten war plan for they do what so many others have done before--they believe in their leaders and hence are willing to follow these leaders' hair brained plans.

So Clinton's Team is Getting Testy, Is It?

Once upon a time I dreamt of voting for a competent, principled, no nonsense woman for the position of President of the United States. I realized then and now that in order to run for the position the woman in question would have to be politically astute, cunning, and even ruthless; however, I expected her not to be like so many others--so married to other people's principles as to have lost a sense of acting on principles based on right or wrong. In other words, someone who, like Martin Luther King, Jr. would not allow naysayers to dissuade her from taking principled stances and arguing for them when others would distract her from those principles.

I do not doubt that Mrs. Clinton is an intelligent, astute, competent, no nonsense woman, but I do question her lack of attachment to any principle worth having. She shakes hands with a Palestinian woman, comes to NY hears herself criticized and changes her mind about the plight of Palestinians. She votes for the Israeli interests because she cannot see the errors inherent in some of those interests and the truly non peace producing acts they engender.

Young John Edwards comes along and speaks out against the war that Bush began and that he supported. Edwards admits his error in supporting the president and now Clinton's campaign team tries to sully Edwards' character with accusations that are not true. Edwards does not criticize Democrats working to counter the president's position--only those Democrats who are working hand in glove with Bush.

Perhaps Mrs. Clinton's team should caution her to get Mr. Clinton from being so cozy with the Bush family. Her husband's infatuation with the elder Bush seems to be clouding her judgment on the difference between right and wrong, between what the definition of defeat in Iraq is etc.

Glad Tidings

The move from Luisa Boricua to here Write for Peace is nearly complete. Now my more political less personal musings can be located in one place. I guess it's fitting that language the medium with which we should attain peace will be the focus here in this blog; although the foolish uses of language have gotten humanity into much trouble as we have seen during the past five years. Let us pray that the time in the wilderness will end soon and that brighter minds, souls, and hearts will prevail.